Issue - meetings

Review of On and Off-Street Parking Charges

Meeting: 20/01/2020 - Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Item 90)

90 Review of On and Off-Street Parking Charges pdf icon PDF 125 KB

To consider the attached report of the Head of Commercial Services.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Head of Commercial Services presented the report on the Review of On and Off-Street Parking Charges.

 

Members were advised that consultation would need to be undertaken in respect of recommendations 7 (with parish councils) and 8 (with permit holders) of the report. 

 

Members expressed concern over the lack of information on the alternative proposals for the permit holders that would be affected by the removal of Deal sea front as a parking option from the resident permits scheme. Members questioned where displaced residents would park and what the impact of the displacement would be on residents in other areas. It was suggested that any consultation should also be with those affected by the displacement of parking from the sea front.

 

The absence of evidence to support the benefit to tourism from removing Deal sea front from the resident permits scheme was also cited as a concern for justifying the decision.

 

Councillor M Rose highlighted the issue of the unfairness of hotelier parking permit books that allowed visitors to park for a lower cost than residents in the same spaces.

 

The impact of proposals on local businesses was raised and the need to consult with them on changes that could affect them. In respect of the proposals to make Albany Place in Dover a free car park, the location and accessibility of the car park was raised.

 

Members discussed whether there were suitable alternatives to introducing charging in rural car parking charges, with options such as limiting duration of stay suggested to encourage turnover.

 

In response to a question from Councillor J Rose, the Head of Commercial Services advised that he would investigate if the Council owned the car park near Dover Castle.  

 

In response to a request from the Chairman, Councillor L A Keen, the Democratic Services Manager explained the Call-In process. Members were advised that the Chairman and Spokesperson for the Overview and Scrutiny Committee could exercise call-in on their own and that any three non-executive members could also call-in a decision.

 

It was moved by Councillor T A Bond and duly seconded by Councillor S H Beer that

 

“The Chairman, Councillor L A Keen, be requested to call-in Cabinet Decision CAB112(h) on the grounds that

(a)       There was no evidence to support the need for this change of policy or the impact on tourism and resident parking.

(b)       That no thought has been given to alternative options or the harm caused by the displaced resident parking on Deal residents.

(c)       That there has been insufficient consultation with those affected.”

 

Councillor M Rose, duly seconded by Councillor R S Walkden, moved the following AMENDMENT

 

(d)       That the impact of the hotelier’s books be reviewed given the discrepancy in the cost of overnight visitor parking compared to the cost of overnight resident parking.

 

On being put to the vote, the AMENDMENT was CARRIED.

 

The Chairman, Councillor L A Keen, indicated in response to the request from the members of the committee that she was prepared to use her powers  ...  view the full minutes text for item 90


Meeting: 13/01/2020 - Cabinet (Item 112)

112 Review of On and Off-Street Parking Charges pdf icon PDF 125 KB

To consider the attached report of the Head of Commercial Services.

 

Responsibility: Portfolio Holder for Transport and Licensing

Additional documents:

Minutes:

It was agreed:

 

(a)  That the outcome of the annual review of parking charges be noted.

 

(b)  That the proposed charges, as set out at Appendix 1 to the report, and the publication of the required Notice of Variation in respect of Off-Street Parking Places, be approved.

 

(c)   That the maximum stay in Pencester, Stanhope and South Street car parks be increased in accordance with Appendix 1 to the report.

 

(d)  That three additional parking permits be introduced, as set out at Appendix 1 to the report.

 

(e)  That free parking be introduced in Albany Place car park, Dover, as set out at Appendix 1 to the report.

 

(f)    That the charging period for St Margaret’s car park be extended, as set out at Appendix 1 to the report.

 

(g)  That, noting the issues outlined in the report regarding the management of rural car parks and the potential benefits of introducing limited controls, the decision on the precise arrangements (if any) within each car park be deferred to allow detailed engagement with each parish council.

 

(h)  That the removal of Deal seafront as a parking option from the Deal resident permits scheme, as detailed in the report, be approved.

 

(i)    That the Transport and Parking Services Manager be authorised to take all necessary legal and procedural processes to give effect to recommendations (b) to (f) and (h), including the publication of the necessary notices of proposal and the making or amendment of any orders under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984.

 

(j)    That the purchase and installation of Pay & Display machines for the rural car parks, as detailed in the report, be approved.