Agenda and minutes

Council - Wednesday, 22nd July, 2015 6.00 pm

Not all meetings are broadcast. The meetings that will be broadcast are as follows: (a) Council; (b) Cabinet; (c) Dover Joint Transportation Advisory Board; (d) General Purposes Committee; (e) Electoral Matters Committee; (f) Governance Committee; (g) Planning Committee; (h) General Purposes Committee and (i) Overview and Scrutiny Committee.

For those meetings that are being broadcast there will be a link to view the live broadcast under the ‘Media’ heading below. Only those items not restricted on the agenda will be broadcast.

Guidance on how to watch live broadcasts of meetings.

The link to view a recording of a meeting that was broadcast can be found on the Council’s YouTube channel (@doverdc)

Venue: Council Chamber - Council Offices. View directions

Contact: Rebecca Brough  Team Leader - Democratic Support

Items
No. Item

20.

Apologies

To receive any apologies for absence.

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors P I Carter, R J Frost and K Mills.

21.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 61 KB

To confirm the attached Minutes of the meeting held on 20 May 2015.

Minutes:

The Minutes of the Annual Council Meeting held on 20 May 2015 were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

22.

Declarations of Interest pdf icon PDF 37 KB

To receive any declarations of interest from Members in respect of business to be transacted on the agenda.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest made by Members.

23.

Announcements

To receive any announcements from the Chairman, Leader, Members of the Cabinet or Head of Paid Service.

Minutes:

The Chairman of the Council made an announcement to wish Ms M Pearce, PA to the Directors, well on her retirement after working for 47 years at Dover District Council and before that Dover Rural Council. 

 

The Leader of the Council made an announcement to congratulate Deal Town Councillor Wayne Elliott on receiving a Locality Public Sector Hero award at the House of Lords.

24.

Leader's Time

To receive an oral report at the meeting from the Leader (and Cabinet) on the business of the Executive or on any topic or subject that it is felt should be brought to the attention of the Council.

 

(Up to fifteen minutes is allowed for the Report of the Leader (and Cabinet), up to ten minutes is allowed for the Leader of the Major Opposition Group (or his nominee) to respond, up to five minutes is allowed for the Leader of any other Opposition Group (or his nominee) to respond.  The Leader is allowed up to five minutes as a Right of Reply or 25% of the time given to the Opposition Group Leaders, whichever is the greatest.)

 

(a)  Leader of the Council – 15 Minutes

(b)  Leader of the Major Opposition Group (Labour Group) – 10 Minutes

(c)  Leader of the Other Opposition Group (UKIP) – 5 Minutes

(d)  Leader of the Council’s Right of Reply – 5 Minutes

Minutes:

The Leader of the Council, Councillor P A Watkins, included the following matters in his report:

 

(a)  That the Council was working to identify possible projects and assist them in bidding for funding under the Coastal Communities Fund.

 

(b)  That three groups had been set up as part of the group to look at the regeneration of Dover Town Centre after the delivery of the Dover Town Investment Zone. The groups would deal with (i) transport, (ii) tourism and (iii) heritage and planning.

 

(c)  The possible changes to the South East England Local Enterprise Partnership following the decision by the Essex LEP area to ask the Government for separate status. There was also support amongst local authorities and business in Kent for the idea of a Kent and Medway LEP.

 

(d)  At the recent Kent Leader’s meeting, the issue of combined authorities for Kent along the lines of the Greater Manchester Combined Authority was discussed. A combined authority would deal with matters such as transport, economic development, health and social care.

 

(e)  That the East Kent Spatial Development Company had reported a surplus of £6 million and received healthy annual income from its land holdings. The EKSPDC was looking at providing commercial loans for infrastructure projects that struggled to receive bank funding and there were potential projects in the pipeline.

 

(f)   That there was a need for more decision-making to be delegated from the Kent Health and Wellbeing Board to the local CCG level boards.

 

(g)  The recent case of an East Kent man who had been sent to Manchester due to the shortage of mental health patient beds and the need for partner agencies to work together to effectively triage patients at the first point of contact.

 

(h)  The rising projected deficit of the East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust meant that changes to services would have been made. The proposals for these, which would be both financially and clinically driven, were expected to be revealed by September.

 

The Leader of the Main Opposition Labour Group, Councillor M R Eddy, included the following matters in his report:

 

(a)  To congratulate the Chairman on her first ordinary meeting of the Council following the Annual Meeting in May.

 

(b)  To welcome the news of the Coastal Community Fund bids while emphasising the need for proper longer term funding for the district.

 

(c)  To state that he looked forward to hearing the outcomes from the three groups looking at aspects of the regeneration of Dover.

 

(d)  That the option of a Kent Local Enterprise Partnership, which was the favoured approach of Kent County Council, could result in improved funding opportunities for Dover.

 

(e)  The need for the Government to find an urgent solution to the transport difficulties affecting Dover and the wider regional implications caused by the longest Operation Stack run to date.

 

(f)   That the experience of shared authorities elsewhere was that the arrangements broke down over a number of years.

 

(g)  To express concern over the ramifications for the future  ...  view the full minutes text for item 24.

25.

Seat Allocation and Group Appointments

To receive from Group Leaders any changes to seat allocations or appointments.

 

(Note:  Any changes must be within the approved allocation of seats to political groups in accordance with the political balance rules (where applicable).)

Minutes:

The Group Leaders advised that there were no seat allocations or group appointments.

26.

Questions from the Public

To receive answers in respect of questions from the public to Members of the Executive asked in accordance with Rule 11 of the Council Procedure Rules.

 

(A maximum of three minutes is allowed for the question to be read.  Up to 15 minutes is allowed for this part of the meeting.  Members of the public may ask one supplementary question in addition to their original question.  Afterwards any other Member at the Chairman's discretion may speak for up to two minutes on a question or reply.)

 

(1)  Mr P Jull will ask the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning, Councillor N S Kenton:

 

            “Will this council consult on a Public Spaces Protection Order to make the feeding of birds in Deal town centre an offence subject to a fixed penalty notice in line with littering and dog fouling, as permitted by the Anti Social Behaviour Act 2014?”

Minutes:

In accordance with Rule 11 of the Council Procedure Rules, Mr Peter Jull gave notice of his intention to ask the following question of a Member of the Cabinet:

 

“Will this council consult on a Public Spaces Protection Order to make the feeding of birds in Deal town centre an offence subject to a fixed penalty notice in line with littering and dog fouling, as permitted by the Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2014?”

 

In response, the Portfolio Holder for Property Management and Public Protection, Councillor T J Bartlett, advised that the Council’s Environmental Protection Team were liaising with Deal Town Council on the issue of birds in the town centre although there were currently no plans to consult on a Public Spaces Protection Order to make the feeding of birds an offence. The introduction of an Order was only one of a number of ways to address the issue of feral bird populations and for an order to be made the Council needed to satisfy itself that a number of grounds were fulfilled.

 

In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 11.8, Mr Jull put a supplementary question to the Portfolio Holder for Property Management and Public Health asking how many times Civil Enforcement Officers had advised members of the public not to feed feral birds. In response, Councillor T J Bartlett stated that a written answer to the question would be provided.

 

27.

Questions from Members

Up to 60 minutes is allowed for this part of the meeting unless extended by the Chairman of Council on a motion moved, duly seconded and approved by the Council.  Members may ask one supplementary question in addition to their original question.

 

(a)        To Chairmen/Vice-Chairmen of Committees

            To receive answers in respect of questions from Members of the Council to the Chairman or Vice-Chairman of the Council or the Chairman of any Committee or Sub-Committee asked in accordance with Rule 12 of the Council Procedure Rules.

            There were no questions received.

 

(b)        To the Executive

            To receive answers in respect of questions from Members of the Council to a Member of the Executive asked in accordance with Rule 12 of the Council Procedure Rules.

            (1)        Councillor A F Richardson will ask the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning, Councillor N S Kenton:

                        Earlier this year it was reported that an individual received a formal caution after being caught on camera dumping a number of bags of waste in the River Dour. I understand this person was identified following a publicity campaign by the Dover Express.


Does the cabinet member for Environment, Waste and Planning think that a caution was an appropriate response to such a blatant and high profile case of fly tipping?

                        Does he accept that in fact this was widely seen as a 'slap on the wrist' which completely failed to act as a deterrent to would-be fly tippers across the District?

                        What assurances can he give that in future cases where fly-tippers are positively identified, a much more robust approach to dealing with them will be adopted?”

 

(2)        Councillor P Walker will ask the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning, Councillor N S Kenton:

It is more than a year since I first referred in this Chamber to there having been over 50 separate conditions set down in relation to planning applications submitted to, and agreed by, this Council for Lydden Racing Circuit. Could the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning outline the progress made in checking upon the implementation of the said conditions and upon how any failures in implementation have been dealt with?

 

(3)        Councillor P J Hawkins will ask the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning, Councillor N S Kenton:

It is now several years since this Council sold off the former Regent Cinema building and, despite questions in full council, nothing appears to happened to the building. Will the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning tell the Council when he expects the owners of the building to submit a planning application relating to this site which is so important to Deal's seafront?

 

(4)        Councillor P M Brivio will ask the Portfolio Holder for Housing, Health and Wellbeing, Councillor P M Beresford:

Can the Portfolio Holder for Housing, Health and Well-being inform the Council of the costs of providing temporary accommodation in financial year 2014/15 for those people towards whom the Council has  ...  view the full agenda text for item 27.

Minutes:

In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 12, Members of the Cabinet responded to the following questions:

 

(1)  Councillor A F Richardson asked the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning, Councillor N S Kenton:

 

“Earlier this year it was reported that an individual received a formal caution after being caught on camera dumping a number of bags of waste in the River Dour. I understand this person was identified following a publicity campaign by the Dover Express.

Does the cabinet member for Environment, Waste and Planning think that a caution was an appropriate response to such a blatant and high profile case of fly tipping?

Does he accept that in fact this was widely seen as a 'slap on the wrist' which completely failed to act as a deterrent to would-be fly tippers across the District?

What assurances can he give that in future cases where fly-tippers are positively identified, a much more robust approach to dealing with them will be adopted?”

In response, Councillor N S Kenton advised that fly tipping legislation allowed for local authorities to prosecute, issue a formal caution or take no further action. Although it was inappropriate to discuss individual cases, when deciding the appropriate course of action consideration was given to the Council’s Environmental Enforcement Policy and the Code for Crown Prosecutors. The Council would prosecute fly-tippers where it was appropriate and in the public interest to do so.

 

In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 12.5, Councillor A F Richardson exercised his right to ask one supplementary question.

 

(2)  Councillor P Walker asked the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning, Councillor N S Kenton:

 

“It is more than a year since I first referred in this Chamber to there having been over 50 separate conditions set down in relation to planning applications submitted to, and agreed by, this Council for Lydden Racing Circuit. Could the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning outline the progress made in checking upon the implementation of the said conditions and upon how any failures in implementation have been dealt with?”

 

In response, Councillor N S Kenton advised that complaints had been received on a wide range of issues relating to the operation of Lydden Racing Circuit and that a systemic review of compliance with the planning conditions currently in force was being conducted by planning and environmental health officers. In addition, discussions would be held with the local Action Group over the issues of concern. However, it had been established that the circuit had not exceeded its number of permitted race days.

 

In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 12.5, Councillor P Walker exercised his right to ask one supplementary question.

 

(3)  Councillor P J Hawkins asked the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning, Councillor N S Kenton:

 

"It is now several years since this Council sold off the former Regent Cinema building and, despite questions in full council, nothing appears to happened to the building. Will the Portfolio Holder for Environment, Waste and Planning tell the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 27.

28.

Motions

Motions for which notice has been given are listed on the agenda in the order in which notice was received, unless the Member giving notice states, in writing, that they propose to move it at a later meeting or withdraw it.

 

If a Motion set out in the agenda is not moved by the Member who gave notice thereof it shall, unless postponed by consent of the Council, be treated as withdrawn and shall not be moved without fresh notice.

 

A Motion must be about matters for which the Council has powers or duties or which affects the District.

 

In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 13, Councillor T P Johnstone will move:

 

            "This Council requests that the Leader writes to the Prime Minister to ascertain the terms of his negotiations with the other member states of the European Union so that residents and businesses within this District, geographically the closest to the European mainland, are fully aware of what is at stake in the proposed referendum on continued membership.”

 

In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 13, Councillor P M Wallace will move:

 

“Following the recent spate of highly publicised fly-tipping in Dover District, this council will lobby the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs for more powers to tackle fly-tipping, specifically seeking

 

(1)  the powers that are currently available in Scotland to hand out on-the-spot fines for fly-tipping, removing the need to seek a prosecution through the Magistrates' Courts;

(2)  the income from any fines to stay in the area to help pay for the cost of cleaning up fly-tipping and enforcement; and

(3)  to tackle the culture of fly-tipping through restorative justice, by making it compulsory for offenders to spend a set number of hours in a supervised clean-up in the district, so offenders learn about the damaging effects of spoiling the environment.”

Minutes:

(1)    In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 13, Councillor T P Johnstone gave notice of his intention to move the following Motion:

 

“This Council requests that the Leader writes to the Prime Minister to ascertain the terms of his negotiations with the other member states of the European Union so that residents and businesses within this District, geographically the closest to the European mainland, are fully aware of what is at stake in the proposed referendum on continued membership.”

 

The Motion was duly seconded.

 

On being put to the vote, the Motion was LOST.

 

(2)    In accordance with Council Procedure Rule 13, Councillor P M Wallace gave notice of his intention to move the following Motion:

 

“Following the recent spate of highly publicised fly-tipping in Dover District, this council will lobby the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs for more powers to tackle fly-tipping specifically seeking

 

(1)  The powers that are currently available in Scotland to hand out on-the-spot fines for fly-tipping, removing the need to seek a prosecution through the Magistrates' Courts;

(2)  The income from any fines to stay in the area to help pay for the cost of cleaning up fly-tipping and enforcement; and

(3)  To tackle the culture of fly-tipping through restorative justice, by making it compulsory for offenders to spend a set number of hours in a supervised clean-up in the district, so offenders learn about the damaging effects of spoiling the environment.”

 

The Motion was duly seconded.

 

On being put to the vote, the Motion was CARRIED.

 

RESOLVED: That following the recent spate of highly publicised fly-tipping in Dover District, this council will lobby the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs for more powers to tackle fly-tipping specifically seeking

 

(1)    The powers that are currently available in Scotland to hand out on-the-spot fines for fly-tipping, removing the need to seek a prosecution through the Magistrates' Courts;

(2)    The income from any fines to stay in the area to help pay for the cost of cleaning up fly-tipping and enforcement; and

(3)    To tackle the culture of fly-tipping through restorative justice, by making it compulsory for offenders to spend a set number of hours in a supervised clean-up in the district, so offenders learn about the damaging effects of spoiling the environment.

29.

KENT AND MEDWAY LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP AND KENT AND MEDWAY GROWTH AND INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK pdf icon PDF 54 KB

To consider the attached report of the Head of Inward Investment.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Head of Inward Investment presented the report on the Kent and Medway Local Enterprise Partnership and the Kent and Medway Growth and Infrastructure Framework.

 

It was moved by Councillor P A Watkins, duly seconded and

 

RESOLVED: That the report and the likely future engagement be noted.

30.

Revision to Contract Standing Orders pdf icon PDF 67 KB

To consider the attached report of the Director of Governance.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Director of Governance presented the report on the Revision to Contract Standing Orders.

 

In response to a question from Councillor L A Keen as to the accuracy of the information displayed on the website in respect of contracts awarded to Dover based companies, Councillor P G Heath in his role as Chairman of the Governance Committee, agreed to add this matter to the agenda of the next meeting of the Committee.

 

It was moved by Councillor P G Health, duly seconded and

 

RESOLVED: That the Council, acting on the recommendation of the Governance Committee and the Monitoring Officer, agreed to adopt the revised Contract Standing Orders as appended to the report.

 

31.

POLICY FOR LONG SERVICE AWARDS TO ELECTED MEMBERS OF DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL pdf icon PDF 55 KB

To consider the attached report of the Director of Governance.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Director of Governance introduced the report on creating a Policy for Long Service Awards to Elected Members of Dover District Council.

 

It was moved by Councillor M D Conolly, duly seconded and

 

RESOLVED:  (a)   That the Policy for Long Service Awards to Elected Members of Dover District Council, as set out in Appendix 1 of the report, be adopted.

 

                        (b)   That the Council records its appreciation of the Long Service of the following Elected Members:

 

(i)            Councillor T J Bartlett for 20 Years of Continuous Service

(ii)           Councillor B W Butcher for 20 Years of Continuous Service

(iii)          Councillor P G Heath for 24 Years of Continuous Service

(iv)         Councillor K Mills for 24 Years of Continuous Service

(v)          Councillor F J W Scales for 20 Years of Continuous Service

(vi)         Councillor P A Watkins for 28 Years of Non-Continuous Service

 

                        (c)   That the Head of Democratic Services be requested to make the necessary arrangements for Long Service Awards to be presented to the meeting of the Council held on 30 September 2015:

 

32.

CONSULTATION UNDER THE LICENSING ACT 2003 - Statement of Policy and Principles pdf icon PDF 57 KB

To consider the report of the Director of Governance.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Director of Governance introduced the report on the Consultation under the Licensing Act 2003 – Statement of Policy and Principles.

 

It was moved by Councillor B Gardner, duly seconded and:

 

RESOLVED:  (a)   That the draft Statement of Licensing Policy be approved and a period of formal consultation from 27 July 2015 until 19 October 2015 be authorised in accordance with the statutory requirements.

 

                        (b) That the results of the consultation be reported to a special meeting of the Licensing Committee to be held in mid-November 2015.

 

                        (c) That the Licensing Committee consider the results of the consultation and the Statement of Licensing Policy and make recommendations and comments to Council.

 

                        (d) That Council at its meeting on 25 November 2015 consider the recommendations and comments of the Licensing Committee in discharging its responsibility for the determination of the Statement of Licensing Policy.

 

33.

Urgent Business Time

To consider any other items deemed by the Chairman of the Council to be urgent in accordance with the Local Government Act 1972.

Minutes:

There were no items of urgent business.